According to a market study by author Delia Passim, women will make more client referrals to their financial advisers than men will. On average, women will make 26 such referrals in their lifetime, which is substantially more than the 11 that men average. These results were presented at the annual conference of the Investment Management Consultants Association.

Kathleen Burns Kingsbury of KBK Wealth Connection was one of the speakers who addressed the differences between men and women in the financial world in a workshop session entitled “Sex, Lies, and Stereotypes” at the conference. She stated that men and women are wired differently when it comes to communicating, researching and approaching a financial issue or decision.

Kingsbury believes that in order for women to makes referrals to other friends, the investment adviser must develop a personal relationship and a connection with them. She said, “If you do the right things, and in a way that fosters trust in female clients, they will connect you with their friends. They are huge referrers.”
Continue reading ›

Colorado is the ninth state to adopt a private fund adviser exemption by rule. The exemption became effective on March 30, 2012. The other states that have created similar rules are California, Indiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Rhode Island, Virginia, and Wisconsin, most of which we have already blogged about.

The Colorado rule exempts investment advisers who manage one or more “venture capital funds,” as defined by Rule 203(l)-1 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act”), and who comply with the SEC Rule 204-4 reporting requirements. Investment advisers that are relying on this exemption will not be required to file the SEC Rule 204-4 reports with the Colorado Securities Commissioner. The rule also incorporates by reference the “grandfather” provision in Rule 203(l)-1(b) under the Advisers Act. Similar to the rules adopted in other states, it also exempts investment adviser representatives who are employed by or associated with an investment adviser that is already exempt under a private fund exemption. Finally, any investment adviser who is subject to disqualification under the “bad boy” provisions in Rule 262 of SEC Regulation A will not be entitled to the exemption.
Continue reading ›

Typically, offshore funds are not subject to regulation under the U.S. securities regulations as long as they are not sold to U.S. citizens or residents. Offshore funds were not liable for fraud under §10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act unless they met the standards for the “conduct or effects” test. The test focused on:

  • Whether the wrongful conduct occurred in the United States; and
  • Whether the wrongful conduct had a substantial effect in the United States or upon United States citizens.

The “conduct or effects” test was rejected in Morrison v. Nat’l Austl. Bank Ltd. in 2010. The court established a new transactional test that stated that §10(b) and Rule 10b-5 do not apply extraterritorially, but only apply to “transactions in securities listed on domestic exchanges and domestic transactions in other securities.” The court stated that domestic transactions should focus on the purchase and sale of securities. The case did not specifically define the term “domestic transactions,” however, because the parties to the case were foreign and the dispute occurred outside the United States.
Continue reading ›

House Financial Services Committee Chairman Spencer Bachus (R-AL) has reintroduced his bill calling for a self-regulatory organization (SRO) for investment advisers. The bill has a Democratic co-sponsor, Rep. Carolyn McCarthy (D-NY), indicating that it may have some bipartisan support. Rep. Bachus said that the bill was drafted in response to a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) study which showed that the SEC does not have sufficient resources to adequately monitor and regulate the 12,000 registered investment advisers. The SEC examined only 8% of advisers in 2011, which is significantly less than the 58% of broker-dealers that were examined.

The bill calls for the creation of one or more SROs which would be called a “National Investment Adviser Association” (NIAA). NIAA would report to the SEC, and investment advisers with retail customers would be required to become members. The bill provides an exception from the membership requirement for investment advisers with less than $100 million in assets under management. The bill gives individual states the authority to regulate those investment advisers as long as the states conduct periodic on-site examinations.
Continue reading ›

On April 11, 2012, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced it will accept comments prior to creating rules required by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act. The SEC believes it is important to hear the public’s opinion before releasing proposed rules. It previously requested comments before rulemaking when the Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act was passed.

The SEC will disclose all information pertaining to the JOBS Act on its website. This will include all meetings with interested parties. The meeting participants must provide an agenda of intended topics in advance, which will be released to the public. The participants will also be encouraged to submit written comments to the public file in order for other interested parties to review the information.
Continue reading ›

Two states have created a time-table to help mid-sized firms make the switch from Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) supervision to state regulated supervision. As a result of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection (Dodd-Frank) Act, those investment advisers with $100 million or less but more than $25 million in assets under management will be required to register with the state or states in which they do business instead of the SEC. We have already discussed the switch in Mid-Sized Advisers Should Have Already Commenced Transition. Both Iowa and Missouri are helping mid-sized firms in their state by creating time-tables and providing guidance for the transition.
Continue reading ›

According to American Century Investments’ third annual Financial Professionals Social Media Adoption Study, more advisers are starting to use various forms of social media for professional uses. The results were drawn from an online survey of 300 financial professionals who are employed as financial advisers, brokers or registered investment advisers. The participants were members of Research Now, and they averaged fourteen years in the financial industry.

The study showed an increase in the use of smartphones and other mobile devices to access social media websites than in previous years. Approximately 35% of advisers claimed to use smartphones for social media access, which is up from the 27% in 2011. Also, there was an increase in advisers who used mobile devices such as iPads and other tablets for access from 11% last year to 22% in 2012. The majority of financial advisers; however, still access social media through laptop and desktop computers.
Continue reading ›

As a result of the Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank), mid-sized firms of less than $100 million in assets under management should make the switch from Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) oversight to state regulatory oversight. Most advisers know that under the newly adopted SEC rules, mid-sized advisers that were SEC registered prior to Dodd-Frank must remain SEC registered through the first quarter of 2012, and then complete their switch to state regulation by June 28, 2012. Firms wishing to switch should have already completed the state registration process to become effective in the state or states in which the adviser is registering.

It was estimated by this time that 3,200 firms would have made the switch to state regulation. However, spokesman John Nester for the SEC announced that as of April 5, a little more than 1,900 firms claimed that they were no longer eligible for SEC registration and needed to make the switch.
Continue reading ›

The Florida Legislature has recently passed a law which imposes harsher penalties for those who sell unregistered securities. The bill, HB 777, was signed into law by Governor Rick Scott on April 6, 2012. The bill will take effect July 1, 2012. As a result, the lowest permissible sentence for violations is increased.

The bill provides that all those who do not register securities offerings with the state’s Office of Financial Regulation may be charged with a third-degree felony at a higher level than previously allowed. A third-degree felony in the state of Florida carries up to a five year prison sentence. Broker-dealers, appointed persons, and issuers of securities who do not register with the Office of Financial Regulation are also subject to the same penalty.
Continue reading ›

In a previous blog, Georgia Securities Commissioner Proposes Rule Amendments, we discussed the proposed amendments to rules previously promulgated under the Georgia Uniform Securities Act of 2008. The amendments were recently adopted and became effective on March 29, 2012.

Parker MacIntyre provides legal and compliance services to investment advisers, broker-dealers, registered representatives, hedge funds and issuers of securities, among others. Our regulatory practice group assists financial service providers with the complex issues that arise in the course of their businesses, including compliance with federal and state laws and rules.

Contact Information